The self-serve alternative to Lumar
Lumar (formerly Deepcrawl) is an enterprise technical-SEO platform sold by quote. CrawlX gives agencies and in-house teams the same cloud crawl depth from a free tier and a $29 plan — and ships the fix as a pull request instead of a Jira ticket.
Lumar is a serious enterprise crawler: cloud-based, fast, with JavaScript rendering, log-file integrations, a GraphQL API, and pre-release testing in CI. It is also sold entirely by quote — the pricing page is a form, and there is no free tier or trial listed. CrawlX runs the same kind of cloud crawl but you sign up and start in a minute, ranks issues by estimated impact, and can open the fix as a GitHub pull request. Here is where each one wins.
The verdict: CrawlX as a Lumar alternative
CrawlX is the practical Lumar alternative for teams that want enterprise-grade cloud crawling without an enterprise sales cycle: 150+ checks, JavaScript rendering, Search Console and GA4 integrations, and AI fixes shipped as pull requests, from a free 500-URL tier and plans starting at $29/month. Lumar still wins on raw crawl speed at very large scale, its Protect pre-release testing in CI/CD, and mature log-file and enterprise analytics integrations.
CrawlX vs Lumar
| Capability | CrawlX | Lumar |
|---|---|---|
| Runs in the cloud (no install) | Cloud | Cloud |
| Self-serve signup | Yes — start in a minute | Sales-led (quote form) |
| Published pricing | From $29/mo | Quote-only |
| Free tier | 500 URLs | None listed |
| JavaScript rendering | Yes | Yes |
| Search Console / GA4 | Yes | Yes |
| Issues ranked by estimated impact | Yes | Severity + custom |
| AI fix suggestions as pull requests | Yes (BYOK) | No — Jira tickets |
| Pre-release testing in CI/CD | No | Yes (Lumar Protect) |
| Log-file analysis | On roadmap | Yes (upload / Splunk / Logz.io) |
| API | REST (Professional+) | GraphQL |
| White-label client reports | Yes (paid) | Yes |
| AI-crawler readiness (GPTBot, llms.txt) | Yes | Partial |
| Published crawl speed | Tier-scaled | Up to 450 URLs/s |
Where Lumar still wins
We'd rather be honest than oversell. Lumar is excellent at these:
- Very high crawl throughput on sites with millions of pages, with published speeds up to 450 URLs per second.
- Lumar Protect runs SEO regression tests in your CI/CD pipeline before a release ships.
- Mature log-file paths (upload, Splunk, Logz.io) and enterprise analytics integrations.
- Accessibility auditing alongside technical SEO on the same platform.
Switch to CrawlX if…
- You want to start crawling today without a demo, a quote, or an annual enterprise contract.
- You would rather ship the fix as a pull request than file a dev ticket and wait.
- Your sites are in the tens or hundreds of thousands of URLs, not tens of millions.
- You run an agency and want white-label reports on a per-seat plan you can actually price into proposals.
Stick with Lumar if…
- You crawl multi-million-URL sites and need the fastest possible throughput.
- Pre-release regression testing in CI/CD (Lumar Protect) is central to your workflow.
- You depend on Lumar's log-file integrations today.
What each costs
CrawlX is free for 500 URLs, then from $29/mo ($19/mo billed annually). Lumar: Quote-only. Lumar publishes no plans or prices — the pricing page is a form, and no free tier or trial is listed.
Moving from Lumar to CrawlX
- Sign up free and add your site by URL — no procurement, no onboarding call.
- Run a 500-URL cloud crawl and compare the findings with your last Lumar report.
- Connect Search Console and GA4 so issues are ranked by real traffic impact.
- Connect the GitHub repo and draft your first fix as a pull request.
Common questions
Is CrawlX a good Lumar alternative?
Yes, for teams that want cloud crawl depth without an enterprise sales process. CrawlX runs 150+ checks with JavaScript rendering and Google integrations, ranks issues by estimated impact, and can open fixes as pull requests, starting free for 500 URLs. Lumar remains the stronger choice for multi-million-URL sites, CI/CD regression testing, and log-file work.
How much does Lumar cost compared to CrawlX?
Lumar does not publish prices — you request a quote. CrawlX publishes every plan: free for 500 URLs, then $29/month (Starter), $79/month (Professional) and $149/month (Agency), each cheaper billed annually.
Does Lumar open pull requests like CrawlX?
No. Lumar can create Jira tickets and draft developer tickets for failed tests, but it does not change code. CrawlX drafts the fix and opens it as a GitHub pull request for review.
Does CrawlX do pre-release testing like Lumar Protect?
Not today. Lumar Protect tests staging builds inside CI/CD before release, which CrawlX does not offer. CrawlX focuses on crawling the live site, ranking what it finds, and shipping fixes.
Is Lumar the same as Deepcrawl?
Yes — Deepcrawl rebranded to Lumar. If you are searching for a Deepcrawl alternative, this page applies.
See it on your own site
Your first cloud crawl runs free — 500 URLs, no credit card, no install.
Lumar details verified 2026-09-13.